ummmmm

I don't submit content, which you can see from looking at my profile. Mostly by the time I've found something amusing, it's been posted on here already. My original reason for starting this argument (I guess that's the best way of wording it) is because someone wanted to pretend to be the mod/admin/owner and preach the rules to someone else. If it's a community, and you don't like the picture/comment, downvote it and move on.

And now I'm being a hypocrite because I'm not doing my own advice, which I will now follow.

ily. Is this a quote? Cos it should be.

So, in your local community, are there any people who don't listen to the rules? (ie, people who do things illegally? pirate music/movies, download... er, steal cars, etc?)

This is why you have police. Moderators in the case of this site. Their job is to decide if it's a breach of the rules (laws) and deal out punishment. Your community doesn't deal out vigilante justice does it? (Unless you live in Gotham, then ignore this rant completely cos everyone loves the god damned batman.)

Because I'm bored, and people spouting hypocritical things get to me easily. Interwebz arguments ftl.

Depends where you work. Pretty sure if RDJ was doing a photo shoot to show off his body (I remember him buffing up for Iron Man 2 or some such), he'd oil up for extra sexiness. Fuck, if I was his age, had had his life style, and were in as good condition as he is, I'd be showing it off too.

Most girls take their boobs to work too bro.

You're white knighting for someone else, without looking up the previous comments? She (assuming it's a chick because I can't see a dude getting butt hurt over boobs, then going "OMG RDJ <3") posted about it being a sexual image, when there isn't any nudity. This is a sexual image, without nudity.

This is a called "being a hypocrite".

Madness?

Bro. The argument is simple. If you use the rules to say "This is not right, it's sexual" about one picture then turn around and say "omg this is sexy" about another, you're a hypocrite.

Again, I don't care about the image, either one. Both made me smile, which is what this site is for, am I wrong?

Couldn't agree more, my Imaginary Friend.

So perving on a dude is different from perving on a chick? Something that gets me about society these days. Topless dudes? fine. Bikini clad chicks? OMGWTFBBQSCANDALUS!

So long as it's not spam, I personally don't care. Normally just express if I like something with an upvote, and try to only make comments if I can make a joke, however bad they might be. Getting sucked into a debate on a lulz site is kinda sad ._.

http://www.lolbrary.com/post/45646/why/?highlight=319215#comment319215

I'm not having a dig at your submission, rather Lirali's double standards.

Doesn't this breach the rules? It's sexual content without any joke.

Then Bill, or another moderator (if there are any), will remove it. That's their "job".

Honestly laughed slightly when I saw this, because it's an excuse a lot of women use to get away with things.

Backseat moding? There's no nudity bro.

For England James?

Isn't she into Loki, not Thor?

"You have no legs"

"They had to remove your intestines and you'll have to shit in a bag for the rest of your life"

"They gave you a lobotomy"

Those are horrible. This is just amusing.

They got bored of censoring her name by the end of it.